Chinese Government To Phase Out Macroeconomic Controls

by Paul Denlinger

Posted Oct. 6, 2004

  Send This Page to A friend

The Chinese government is planning to phase out its macroeconomic controls, arguing that the Chinese economy has already had a successful soft landing. The controls were introduced earlier this year in an effort to cool rapidly growing Chinese domestic demand.

A successful soft landing has been the main point of focus for Chinese premier Wen Jiabao, who came to power in 2003. As Chinese domestic demand first drove up commodity prices and then retail prices worldwide and in China, many economic observers have argued that the Chinese economy is overheating and asked for a tightening of liquidity in the Chinese economy.

The policy efforts have been unclear, as have been the results. New private companies have had the most difficulty obtaining cash for expansion, while many loss-making state-owned enterprises have continued to be able to obtain cash at the local and provincial levels. The central government has only confronted local governments in several high-profile cases, and some high-profile projects, especially in the Shanghai area, have suspended construction until the policy is loosened up.

Western and Japanese companies have continued to invest in China, and foreign direct investment in China in 2003 was US$60 billion, in contrast to the US's $30 billion, putting China's FDI at the number one position in the world. This trend will continue in 2004. Because the Chinese government controls do not affect non-Chinese companies, the effect of the Chinese administrative controls have been very lop-sided.

The strong growth of the Chinese economy has revealed that the controls available to the Chinese central government are limited. The economic tools available for controlling overheating are relics from the socialist command economy, but the economy is now a rapidly developing market economy.

In order to adapt, the Chinese financial sector will need to change rapidly to reflect the needs of the new market economy. It is likely that at the highest levels of the government, there is a realization that intervention with the wrong tools can do more harm than good. So, the wisest policy is to declare victory, and let the economy grow at its own pace, with a minimum of government intervention.

Before you go, did you like this article?
If so, you can receive a free email newsletter version each weekday. Sign up using the China Business Express form on this page.

Send This Page to A friend